On September 13, 2026, the Faculty of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Science, VNU-HCM, in collaboration with the USAC Astronomy Club, organized a workshop entitled “IMPROVE YOUR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH LITERACY WITH THE CERIC METHOD.” The workshop provided an academic space for students and learners to explore systematic approaches to reading, analyzing, and engaging with scientific literature.

From Reading Scientific Literature to Analyzing Scientific Arguments

With the participation of Prof. Adam J. Burgasser (University of California, San Diego) and Dr. Genevive Bjorn (Higher Learning Lab), the workshop introduced a structured approach to engaging with scientific literature. Rather than simply reading to understand the content, participants were encouraged to formulate questions, identify scientific arguments, evaluate evidence, and consider research findings within a broader context.

A key focus of the workshop was the CERIC method, which consists of five components: Claim, Evidence, Reasoning, Implications, and Context. Through these five components, participants were introduced to a systematic framework for analyzing scientific research-from identifying the main claims and examining the supporting evidence, to understanding the reasoning behind those claims, considering their implications, and placing the findings within a broader scientific context.

This approach transforms scientific reading from a process of simply receiving information into an active process of analysis and engagement with knowledge, while helping learners develop critical thinking skills and formulate meaningful research questions.

AI and Scientific Research Literacy

Another important topic discussed during the workshop was the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in learning and scientific research.

As AI tools are increasingly being used to search for, summarize, and process information, the ability to use these tools thoughtfully and selectively has become an increasingly important academic skill. The workshop highlighted the role of critical thinking when working with AI, particularly the ability to verify information, evaluate sources, and independently assess the validity of scientific arguments.

In this context, AI is not simply viewed as a tool for supporting research, but as part of a broader learning process in which researchers and students remain actively engaged in searching for, evaluating, and constructing knowledge.

Connecting Learning Methods with Scientific Research

Through discussions, interactive activities, and Q&A sessions, the workshop provided participants with opportunities to explore practical approaches to reading scientific literature and to exchange ideas with experts about effective learning and research practices.

The activity contributed to strengthening the connection between education and scientific research, encouraging students to develop habits of reading more deeply, asking more precise questions, and evaluating information based on evidence. These skills serve as important foundations for students as they gradually engage more deeply with scientific research.

hrough the workshop “IMPROVE YOUR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH LITERACY WITH THE CERIC METHOD,” the Faculty of Physics and Engineering Physics and the USAC Astronomy Club continue to create opportunities for academic exchange, connecting scientific knowledge, research methodologies, and practical experience.

The workshop also contributes to fostering a culture of active learning, critical thinking, and research engagement among students and the broader academic community.